WebQuest
BUILD-A-MEAL
Evaluation
Rubric
| # | Beginning 1 | Developing 2 | Very Good 3 | Exemplary 4 | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison Chart -Group Grade | No Chart. Chart is hand drawn. Chart lacks the comparison of the two restaurants. Includes less than 3 nutritional value comparisons. | Chart shows an attempt at comparing the two (or more) restaurants. Doesn't include what the meal consists of. Includes 3-5 nutritional value comparisons. | Chart shows the comparison between the meal choices and is visually appealing. Gives an in-depth summary of what the meal consisted of. Includes 5-7 nutritional value comparisons. | Chart shows distinct comparison between restaurants and the graph is well organized and labeled. The chart has included additional extras, such as 3D or color. Gives an in-depth summary of what the meal consists of. Includes 6-10 nutritional value comparisons. | %35 |
| Restaurant Review Article *Introduction; Sentence Branching; Detail; Grammar -Individual Grade | Introduction is confusing or missing. Sentences are simple or run-ons that lack detail. Multiple grammatical errors. | Introduction is brief and lacks a personal anecdote. Sentences are simple or run-ons with few details. Occasional grammatical errors. | Introduction shows personality and reason and uses a powerful anecdote. Sentences have nice detail. There are some sentence structure problems, but nothing severe. Detail throughout review is noticeable. Few grammatical mistakes. | Introduction shows personality and reason and uses a personal anecdote. Sentences are full of life, have lots of detail and are branched nicely. Grammar is exceptional. | %15 |
| Restaurant Review Article *Description of meal and menu -Individual Grade | Doesn't describe a possible meal (the meal from the graphic organizer). Doesn't describe some of the options on the menu. Leaves out analysis. | Describes the menu but fails to link the graphic organizer to the review. Leaves out analysis. | Links a meal selected in the graphic organizer to the review. Leaves out analysis, more of a summary. Gives opinion and grade of restaurant capabilities to meet health needs. | Links a meal selected in the graphic organizer to the review. Analyzes multiple menu choices and gives opinion and grade of restaurant capabilities to meet health needs. | %40 |
| Overall Group Magazine Article and Graphic Organizer Presentation. | An article is missing or both articles are related. Graphic organizer is missing. The entire package isn't appealing. | Articles don't relate to graphic organizer. Visual presentation is mundane. Graphic organizer isn't mentioned in article often, if at all. | Graphic organizer correlates nicely with articles. Articles aren't the same; have different theses. Presentation is visually effective. | Both articles are written nicely and have different theses. Graphic Organizers include more than two restaurants. Very visually effective. | %10 |
Total Score: %100 |
|||||
The Public URL for this WebQuest:
http://zunal.com/webquest.php?w=18786
WebQuest Hits: 2,339
Save WebQuest as PDF
