WebQuest
What is in an Argument?
Evaluation
.jpg)
Rubric
| # | D | C | B | A | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steps One, Two, and Three | Many definitions are incomplete or inaccurate. Documents are saves under wrong label and in wrong directory. | Definitions are complete but have been copied and pasted or lack completeness. Documents are either saved under the wrong label or in the wrong directory | Definitions are clear and accurate. Examples provided show evidence of comprehension. Documents are saved under the correct label and in the correct directory. | Definitions are clear and accurate. Examples provided show evidence clear understanding of concepts. Documents are saved under the correct label and in the correct directory. | %15 |
| Step 4 - Analyzing an Argument | Analysis is incomplete and shows lack of understanding concepts. Documents are saves under wrong label and in wrong directory. | Analysis shows adequate application of terms, but lacks a clear understanding of some terms and demonstrates an average attempt at application. Documents are either saved under the wrong label or in the wrong directory. | Analysis shows clear and accurate application of terms. Application of terms has been applied fairly accurately to all aspects of the speech. Documents are saved under the correct label and in the correct directory. | Analysis evidences ability apply terms with exceptional understanding. Entire speech has been included in term application. Documents are saved under the correct label and in the correct directory. | %35 |
| Write persuasive compositions: a. Structure ideas and arguments in a sustained and logical fashion. b. Use specific rhetorical devices to support assertions (e.g., appeal to logic through reasoning; appeal to emotion or ethical belief; relate a personal anecdote, case study, or analogy). c. Clarify and defend positions with precise and relevant evidence, including facts, expert opinions, quotations, and expressions of commonly accepted beliefs and logical reasoning. d. Address readers' concerns, counterclaims, biases, and expectations. | Thesis is not clear. Sources cited lack credibility. There is an attempt to cite sources but clearly lacks an understanding of citations. Not all appeals and devices have been applied. Documents are saves under wrong label and in wrong directory. | Thesis is a bit weak. Sources show some issues of credibility. There is an attempt to cite sources, but there may need to be corrections. One appeal or two devices are not applied. Documents are either saved under the wrong label or in the wrong directory. | Thesis represents an adequate argument. Sources reflect credibility. Sources are cited correctly All appeals and devices are applied but may not be used as effectively as possible. Documents are saved under the correct label and in the correct directory. | Thesis reflects a strong and clear argument. Sources are credible and cited correctly. All appeals and devices are applied with a clear understanding of their purpose. Documents are saved under the correct label and in the correct directory. | %50 |
| %0 | |||||
Total Score: %100 |
|||||
The Public URL for this WebQuest:
http://zunal.com/webquest.php?w=5717
WebQuest Hits: 9,515
Save WebQuest as PDF
