WebQuest
What's Your Opinion?
Evaluation
There are many standards to be assessed within this WebQuest. They include, but are not limited to:
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.6.1 Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.6.6 Determine an author's point of view or purpose in a text and explain how it is conveyed in the text.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.6.7 Integrate information presented in different media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively) as well as in words to develop a coherent understanding of a topic or issue.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.6.8 Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.6.1Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.6.1.a Introduce claim(s) and organize the reasons and evidence clearly.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.6.1.b Support claim(s) with clear reasons and relevant evidence, using credible sources and demonstrating an understanding of the topic or text.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.6.1.c Use words, phrases, and clauses to clarify the relationships among claim(s) and reasons.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.6.1.d Establish and maintain a formal style.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.6.1.e Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from the argument presented.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.6.7 Conduct short research projects to answer a question, drawing on several sources and refocusing the inquiry when appropriate.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.6.8
Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources; assess the credibility of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and providing basic bibliographic information for sources.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.6.9 Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.6.9.b Apply grade 6 Reading standards to literary nonfiction (e.g., "Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not").
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.6.1 Engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grade 6 topics, texts, and issues, building on others' ideas and expressing their own clearly.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.6.1.a Come to discussions prepared, having read or studied required material; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence on the topic, text, or issue to probe and reflect on ideas under discussion.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.6.1.b Follow rules for collegial discussions, set specific goals and deadlines, and define individual roles as needed.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.6.1.c Pose and respond to specific questions with elaboration and detail by making comments that contribute to the topic, text, or issue under discussion.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.6.1.d Review the key ideas expressed and demonstrate understanding of multiple perspectives through reflection and paraphrasing.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.6.4 Present claims and findings, sequencing ideas logically and using pertinent descriptions, facts, and details to accentuate main ideas or themes; use appropriate eye contact, adequate volume, and clear pronunciation.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.6.5 Include multimedia components (e.g., graphics, images, music, sound) and visual displays in presentations to clarify information.
Rubric
# | Excellent (4) | Good (3) | Fair (2) | Poor (1) | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative Work | Student works very well with other group members and listens to other students' ideas. Student uses time well. | Student works well with other group members. Student listens to ideas but fails to use time well. | The student works okay with other group members but does not listen to other students' ideas and does not manage his/her time well. | Student does not seem to be part of the group and does not work with others. Student does not listen to other students' ideas and does not manage time well. | 25 |
Writing, presentation, and style (spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization, structure, organization) | No errors. | Very few or minor errors, content presented well. | Several or major errors took away from presentation. | Too many errors. Presentation deemed inadequate. | 25 |
Personal Performance in Presentation | Student presents their portion of the project well. The student knows their information very well and you can tell they have done their research. | Student presents their information but may not have done as much preparing as they needed to. You can tell they have done their research. | Student presents their material but does not seem to be very knowledgeable about their topic. They may not have done as much research as they needed. | Student has very little if any, information to present to the class. You can tell they did not do as much research needed for this group project. | 50 |
0 | |||||
Total Score: |
Attachments
-
Final Project
Description: Use this when creating your final physical project.
-
Speech Rubric
Description: Use this when constructing your speech for the debate.
-
Debate Rubric
Description: Use this when planning your debate with your team.
The Public URL for this WebQuest:
http://zunal.com/webquest.php?w=310692
WebQuest Hits: 1,134
Save WebQuest as PDF