WebQuest
An orange rolling... writing a narrative story
Evaluation
The evaluation will be positive if we have succeeded our goals.
GENERALLY
The european programmes, like e-twinning, have been organized in the spirit of growing of communication between the teachers of the european union's countries. So, a formation of a consiousness of the european citizen's will be formed due to the idea of belonging in a wider citizens' society of the European Union, through the contact and the cooperation with different civilizations and the respect of other cultures.
Also, the use of a common language as a communication tool and the sharing of ideas and practices, teaching and pegagogical.
Additionally, the creative dialogue between the educational organazations improves their relationships, creating new friendships and open the horizons of the students and teachers.
This project has goals the cooperation, the team work though communication, the know of other cultures and civilazations and the contact with students of other countries. In this spirit we will complete the form to evaluate the basic points of our cooperation and the success of our project. Our project with some differences can be utilize in many lessons, e.g. history, environmental studies. Any part of it inserted in the project with a variety of issues.
The DIARY of our project present step by step entire the project progress
ESPECIALLY Goals of project
- Cooperation among the teachers of the same school
- Cooperation among the teachers of other European countries
- Sharing of good practices
- Production of creative material
- Development and materialization of a rich multilateral project
- Learning about the involved countries' educational systems
- Acquaintance of the diversity
- Focus on at the common place of the involved countries
- Cooperative and team work
- Involvement to innovative work
- Improvement of skills (social, foreign language, ICT, writing, etc.)
- Cultivation of friendships with European teachers
Aims for our students:
- to learn about other countries (general datas)
- to learn about their partners
- to communicate with them in English language
- to practice English language
- to motivate imagination
- to develop dialogue and argumentation
- to practice team work
- to recognize a good thought or suggestion and to reward it
- to entrust a work (e.x.)painting) on a gifted child of the class
- to suggest new activities (e.x. different techniques of paintings)or to share knowledge on ICT tools
- to feel satisfied with the project results
- to recognize and show off personal skills which are sometimes hidden
- to widen children horizons
The evaluation form had sent to the teachers separately and it completed one by one.
Rubric
| # | Disappointing | Inadequate | Good | Excellent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOALS in PLANNING | It is unclear what the goals of the project will be | The aims aren’t realistic (age, social, individual differences) | The written description of the process adequately describes the goals of project. | The goals are clear and realistic. The project has been planned according to the students’ needs and abilities. | 25 |
| OALS in INDEX | The project level is simply a collection of information. | The works demand only synthesis of information | It has a few creative activities. | It is highly creative and goes beyond memorization and engaging. | 25 |
| RESULTS in SKILLS RESULTS in PRODUCTS | No clues are given to present a summary. There is no produced material (such as video, music, graphics) which shows that group followed the directions. | Some poor clues are given to present a summary. There is little produced material which showed that our group followed the directions. | A lot of clues are given to present a summary but not adequate. There were products from the cooperation but there aren’t enough. | Detailed information is given of the skills that the students obtained. The products are innovative (poster, video, cartoon, games, crossword, PP presentations) and refer how the students’ new knowledge can be transferred to other topics. | 25 |
| COOPERATION | The final product was not a collaboration effort. The group showed no evidence of it. | The team had problem working together. Little collaboration occurred. | The teachers’ cooperation is satisfied but it could have utilized each other's skills to a better degree. | The teachers’ cooperation is excellent. They had a good communication. They are conscious to their timetable. They exchanged their good practices | 25 |
Total Score: 100 |
|||||
The Public URL for this WebQuest:
http://zunal.com/webquest.php?w=212507
WebQuest Hits: 2,690
Save WebQuest as PDF
