|
Accuracy of the definition of Programming and Pascal and its use.
|
Barely defined and evidence of minimal effort is clear. |
Not clearly defined but the overall point of what was written is clear. |
Clearly defined but no plausible reason as to why Pascal is still useful. |
Brilliantly defined and very clear and compelling reason as to why Pascal is still needed in programming. |
25% |
|
Writing the Programs.
|
Programs are unfinished with all errors imaginable. |
Programs are error free but are unfinished. |
Programs are finished and are error free but when run logic errors present themselves. |
All programs are completed, no errors present and they run smoothly. |
75% |
