| | Beginning | Developing | Very good | Excellent | Score |
|
| Information research on Great Britain | Only one or two pages visited. Copy / paste information. | The quality of the information provided reflects reading from most of the Web pages. | The quality of the information provided reflects reading from all the Web pages provided. | Followed all the suggested links, read and synthesized information, by mind mapping it. Suggested more links in the bibliography. | 25% |
|
| Group Presentation | Poorly organized, very unclear, lacked in knowledge of region or city. | Only included information from journals, not all group members participated equally, lacked in clarity, and could have been better organized. | Well-presented, well-organized, but not all group members participated equally. | Well-presented, well-organized, included a variety of information of the city or region, each group member took an equal role, and it was clear and concise. | 25% |
|
| Individual Journal | Didn't answer questions or the answers had no relevance to the questions. | Just listed the answers didn't elaborate. | Detailed answers of the questions, filled out the journal completely. | Detailed answers of the questions, filled out the journal completely, and included their own ideas/experiences. | 25% |
|
| Understanding and answering listeners' questions. | Difficulty in understanding what other people say. Incapacity of asking for understanding Incapacity of answering questions. | Difficulty in understanding and giving answers. Yet, there's questioning for clarification. | Understands very easily. Very fluent speech. Few pronunciation and stress mistakes. However does not perform convincingly. | Very fluent and making almost no mistakes. Convincing performance. No difficulty in answering the listeners' questions. | 25% |
|
| Total Score: 100% |
