WebQuest

Bioengineering Food - A Harvest of Fear?

Evaluation

20111028074551zatuV.gif

Both Task A and B is evaluated based on the standard and criteria given in the evaluation rubric below. Your main task is Task B which is to produce a newsletter on issues of GM food and write an argumentative essay each in one of the newsletter column! The total score for both tasks is 100%. 

Rubric

# Beginning Developing Very Good Excellent Score
Journal/ Scrapbook Lacks illustration and graphics. Not appealing to the readers.Very little information about GMO. Language is very messy and lacks organization. Some good illustration and graphics included. Only some of the features appeal to the readers.Has modest information about GMO. Language is only sometimes accurate.Some planning and organization but not quite satisfactorily. Many good illustration and graphics included. Appealing to the readers. Very good information about GMO. Language is largely accurate. Very good planning and organization of data. Excellent display of illustration and graphics. Very appealing and all information about GMO is perfectly presented.Very confident control of language. Efficient planning and organization of data. 20 %
Team work/ Collaboration Members cannot work with one anothe. Lacks group effort to finish the tasks. Each member can work with one another. Some equal contributions of work; able to finish the tasks. Each member gives good cooperation and shows equal contribution of effort to complete the tasks. Excellent team work from each member.Shows great cooperation and equal contribution of effort to complete the tasks. 10 %
Newsletter (Graphics and Contents) Graphics and contents are inappropriate.Covers very little information on issues of GM Food only. Contains some appropriate graphics and contents. Covers some good information on issues of GM Food. Contains very good and interesting graphics. Contents on the issues of GM Food are appropriate and adequate. Graphics and contents are excellently organized and displayed. Information on issues of GM Food is effectively conveyed. 10 %
Argumentative Writing (Content and Language) Lacks in content points; too many spelling and grammar errors. Has some content points but meaning is occasionally unclear; some errors in spelling and grammar. Many content points presented in arguments. Able to persuade readers; a few minor errors in spelling and grammar. Contains excellent content points Able to persuade readers very well; very little spelling and grammar errors 60 %

Total Score: 100 %

The Public URL for this WebQuest:
http://zunal.com/webquest.php?w=119882
WebQuest Hits: 30,148
Save WebQuest as PDF

Ready to go?

Select "Logout" below if you are ready
to end your current session.