Extremely well organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from one idea to another; the organization enhanced effectiveness of project.
Presented in a thoughtful manner; there were signs of organization and most transitions were easy to follow but at times ideas were unclear
Somewhat organized; ideas were not presented coherently and transitions were not always smooth
Choppy and confusing; format was difficult to follow; transitions of ideas were abrupt.
Competence: Content accuracy
Completely accurate, use vocabulary, and correct structure
Argument was stated and defended with strong support from sources. Use some vocabulary with few grammar mistakes
Argument was minimally stated and defended. Have frequently mistakes in spelling and grammar
Written argument did not state or defend and argument. A lot of mistakes in vocabulary do not use grammar correctly.
Was extremely creative; very imaginative; original, use pictures, animation, colorful.
Was creative; thoughtful; use some pictures, some animation.
Was creative; use some colorful pictures
Little creative; do not use pictures, animation, colorful presentation
Clearly stated the argument and defended it with supporting information with the language of the presentation aimed at the client. Zero reading from written argument
Defend argument, left out some helpful supporting information, some reading from written argument
Read from argument but presented an opinion outside of merely reading paper aloud.
Simply read from the written argument. Do not argue or support information.