| |
Poor
|
Satisfactory
|
Good
|
Excellent
|
Score |
|
|
Group Research(suffieicent sources / cooperation)
|
There are not enough sources that group found. The group had difficulty working together. Unequal group participation and contribution. Time wasted. |
There are 1 or 2 sources that group found. The group had some difficulty working together but able to resolve problems. Not all members contributed equally. |
There are 3 sources that group found. The group had not much problems working together. Group members participated and contributed quite equally well. |
There are more than 4 sources that group found. The group worked together effectively in accomplishing the tasks. All group members participated and contributed equally and effectively. |
15% |
|
|
Group Presentation (effectiveness, accuracy and fluency, voice, gestures and eye-contact)
|
Quite dull, many errors in speech, lacks fluency, voices are soft and unclear with minimal gestures and eye-contact. |
Able to hold audience attention, some speech errors, some fluency and voices are quite clear. Some gestures and eye-contact. |
Interesting and able to sustain audience attention, minimal speech errors and quite fluent. Voices are loud and clear. Good gestures and eye-contact. |
Very interesting and effective delivery of speech. Minor errors with one or two slips and very fluent. Voices are very loud and clear. Engages audience with very good gestures and eye-contact. |
35% |
|
|
Class Discussion(participation / number of questions)
|
There are no proper question which can lead class to discussion. Group members rarely participate in class discussion. |
There are only one proper question which can lead class to discussion. Some group members participate in the class discussion. |
There are two proper questions which can lead class to discussion. Most group members participate in the class discussion. |
There are more than three questions which can lead class to discussion. All group members participate in the class discussion, as well as lead discussion themselves. |
20% |
|
|
Summary Paper(task fulfilment/ content,organization and language accuracy)
|
Paper shows limited response to the task with little information presented. No clear planning and lacks credibility of sources. Contains many spelling and grammatical errors. |
Paper shows modest response to the task with some relevant information presented. Some information is logically sequenced and there are some accuracy, credibility of sources. Contains some spelling and grammatical errors. |
Paper shows good response to the task with reasonably well developed ideas. Most information is organized in a clear logical way and all sources have accuracy and credibility. Contains only minor spelling and grammatical errors. |
Paper shows excellent response to the task with all ideas effectively developed. Excellent planning with all information and ideas. Sources show fulfilled accuracy and credibility. Almost flawless with one or two slips. Contains wide variety of sentence structures and vocabulary. |
30% |
|
| Total Score: 100%
|
