| |
Beginning
|
Developing
|
Very good
|
Excellent
|
Score |
|
|
Information research on Great Britain
|
Only one or two pages visited. Copy / paste information. |
The quality of the information provided reflects reading from most of the Web pages. |
The quality of the information provided reflects reading from all the Web pages provided. |
Followed all the suggested links, read and synthesized information, by mind mapping it. Suggested more links in the bibliography. |
25% |
|
|
Group Presentation
|
Poorly organized, very unclear, lacked in knowledge of region or city. |
Only included information from journals, not all group members participated equally, lacked in clarity, and could have been better organized. |
Well-presented, well-organized, but not all group members participated equally. |
Well-presented, well-organized, included a variety of information of the city or region, each group member took an equal role, and it was clear and concise. |
25% |
|
|
Individual Journal
|
Didn't answer questions or the answers had no relevance to the questions. |
Just listed the answers didn't elaborate. |
Detailed answers of the questions, filled out the journal completely. |
Detailed answers of the questions, filled out the journal completely, and included their own ideas/experiences. |
25% |
|
|
Understanding and answering listeners' questions.
|
Difficulty in understanding what other people say. Incapacity of asking for understanding Incapacity of answering questions. |
Difficulty in understanding and giving answers. Yet, there's questioning for clarification. |
Understands very easily. Very fluent speech. Few pronunciation and stress mistakes. However does not perform convincingly. |
Very fluent and making almost no mistakes. Convincing performance. No difficulty in answering the listeners' questions. |
25% |
|
| Total Score: 100%
|
