WebQuest
East Middle School 2nd Qtr - One Event:Many Perspectives
Evaluation
Webquest � Outcomes � Stage 6 Ancient History
Your Working Document and Analytical Writing Task will be assessed as per the Evaluation Rubric which has been based on the Outcomes of the Ancient History Stage 6 Syllabus Part 1 (a) (included below)
Part I: Introduction
(a) Investigating the Past: History, Archaeology and Science
Outcomes
Students:
P3.1 locate, select and organise relevant information from a variety of sources
P3.2 identify relevant problems of sources in reconstructing the past
P3.3 comprehend sources and analyse them for their usefulness and reliability
P3.4 identify and account for differing perspectives and interpretations of the past
Students learn to:
� comprehend and analyse a range of written and archaeological sources in reconstructing
the past
� ask appropriate historical questions and test hypotheses about the nature of the sources,
their reliability and usefulness and the problems posed by sources in reconstructing the
past
� evaluate differing perspectives and interpretations of the past
Rubric
| # | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Excellent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teamwork and Working Document | Very few team members contributed to the webquest. Students were not considerate of each other�s arguments of points of view. Mostly ineffective time management. | Some team members contributed to the Webquest. Some listened attentively and considered each other�s arguments of points of view. Time management not effective. | Most team members contributed to the webquest. Most listened attentively and considered each other�s arguments of points of view. Mostly effective time management. | All team members contributed to the Webquest. All listened attentively and considered each other�s arguments or points of view. Effective time management | 15 |
| Analytical Writing Task | Essay is of a poor standard. There is little to no logical flow of ideas. Ideas are not supported with evidence. | Essay is of a satisfactory standard. It is constructed with some flow of ideas. Some ideas are supported with evidence. | Essay is of a good standard. It is constructed well with some logical flow of ideas. Most ideas are supported with evidence. | Essay is of a very high standard. It is clearly constructed with a logical flow of ideas. Ideas are supported with evidence. | 20 |
| Sources | Student�s identification of relevant problems of sources in reconstructing the past is poor. Questions about the reliability of sources and the student�s ability to evaluate perspectives and interpretations of the past are very limited. | Student�s identification of relevant problems of sources in reconstructing the past is satisfactory. Questions about the reliability of sources and the student�s ability to evaluate perspectives and interpretations of the past are satisfactory. | Student�s identification of relevant problems of sources in reconstructing the past is very good. Questions about the reliability of sources and the student�s ability to evaluate perspectives and interpretations of the past are very good. | Student�s identification of relevant problems of sources in reconstructing the past is excellent. Questions about the reliability of sources and the student�s ability to evaluate perspectives and interpretations of the past are excellent | 10 |
| Citing and References | No sources or references used. | Essay contains 1-2 sources and are cited and referenced. Some with errors. | Essay contains 3-4 sources. All sources are cited and referenced with some few errors. | Comprehensive use of sources to support essay. All sources are cited and referenced with no errors. | 5 |
Total Score: 50 |
|||||
The Public URL for this WebQuest:
http://zunal.com/webquest.php?w=113348
WebQuest Hits: 1,716
Save WebQuest as PDF
